Adam
a9a9f7cd41
Document full 6-phase improvement plan with: - Phase 1 & 5 complete (code quality + namespaced API) - Phase 2-4, 6 planned (network reliability, KRL coordination, advanced motion, validation) - Success criteria for each phase - Research publication goals - Timeline and approach
306 lines
9.9 KiB
Markdown
306 lines
9.9 KiB
Markdown
# RSIPI Improvement Roadmap
|
|
|
|
**Goal:** Transform RSIPI into publication-quality research software for industrial robot control
|
|
|
|
**Status:** Phase 1 ✅ Complete | Phase 5 ✅ Complete | Phase 2-4, 6 📋 Planned
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Overview
|
|
|
|
Six-phase improvement plan to make RSIPI world-class Python library for KUKA RSI control, suitable for publication in robotics research papers and industrial applications.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## ✅ Phase 1: Code Quality Foundation (COMPLETE)
|
|
|
|
**Objective:** Establish professional code quality baseline
|
|
|
|
**Completed Tasks:**
|
|
- ✅ Add comprehensive type hints to all core modules (500+ annotations)
|
|
- ✅ Create custom exception hierarchy (20+ specialized exceptions)
|
|
- ✅ Replace all print() statements with proper logging
|
|
- ✅ Add comprehensive docstrings with Args/Returns/Raises sections
|
|
- ✅ Improve error handling with exception chaining
|
|
|
|
**Files Modified:**
|
|
- `rsi_client.py` - State machine with typed exceptions
|
|
- `network_handler.py` - CSV logging and UDP communication
|
|
- `config_parser.py` - XML parsing with proper exception handling
|
|
- `safety_manager.py` - Safety validation with typed limits
|
|
- `exceptions.py` - NEW comprehensive exception hierarchy
|
|
|
|
**Commit:** `50e6df9` (January 16, 2026)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 📋 Phase 2: Network Reliability (PLANNED)
|
|
|
|
**Objective:** Ensure rock-solid network communication and diagnostics
|
|
|
|
**Planned Tasks:**
|
|
1. Implement timing instrumentation (latency, jitter, cycle time tracking)
|
|
2. Add watchdog timer for communication loss detection
|
|
3. Implement network quality monitoring (packet loss, IPOC gaps, buffer health)
|
|
4. Optimize CSV logging to prevent timing impact
|
|
5. Add auto-reconnection with graceful recovery
|
|
6. Run 24-hour echo server stability test and collect metrics
|
|
|
|
**Expected Deliverables:**
|
|
- Fully implemented `DiagnosticsAPI` namespace
|
|
- Real-time network health monitoring
|
|
- Automatic recovery from network failures
|
|
- Performance metrics dashboard
|
|
- Stability test report
|
|
|
|
**Target Namespace:**
|
|
- `api.diagnostics.get_stats()`
|
|
- `api.diagnostics.get_timing()`
|
|
- `api.diagnostics.is_healthy()`
|
|
- `api.diagnostics.get_network_quality()`
|
|
- `api.diagnostics.start_watchdog()`
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 📋 Phase 3: KRL Coordination (PLANNED)
|
|
|
|
**Objective:** Seamless Python-KRL coordination and communication
|
|
|
|
**Planned Tasks:**
|
|
1. Implement high-level Digital I/O API (set_output, get_input, pulse)
|
|
2. Add KRL state coordination helpers (wait_for_signal, signal_complete)
|
|
3. Implement parameter passing via Tech variables
|
|
4. Create KRL code templates for all coordination scenarios
|
|
5. Enhance inject_rsi_to_krl with coordination boilerplate options
|
|
|
|
**Expected Deliverables:**
|
|
- Enhanced `IOAPI` with high-level I/O methods
|
|
- Enhanced `KRLAPI` with coordination helpers
|
|
- KRL template library for common patterns
|
|
- Example coordination workflows
|
|
- Documentation on Python-KRL handshaking
|
|
|
|
**Target Methods:**
|
|
- `api.io.set_output(channel, value)`
|
|
- `api.io.get_input(channel)`
|
|
- `api.io.pulse(channel, duration)`
|
|
- `api.krl.wait_for_signal(channel, timeout)`
|
|
- `api.krl.signal_complete(channel)`
|
|
- `api.krl.write_param(slot, value)`
|
|
- `api.krl.read_param(slot)`
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 📋 Phase 4: Advanced Motion Control (PLANNED)
|
|
|
|
**Objective:** Professional-grade trajectory planning and execution
|
|
|
|
**Planned Tasks:**
|
|
1. Implement velocity profiling (trapezoidal, S-curve)
|
|
2. Add coordinate frame transformation helpers
|
|
3. Implement motion primitives (arc, circle, spiral)
|
|
4. Add path blending for smooth transitions
|
|
|
|
**Expected Deliverables:**
|
|
- Enhanced `MotionAPI` with advanced planning
|
|
- Velocity profiling algorithms
|
|
- Geometric motion primitives
|
|
- Path blending for continuous motion
|
|
- Motion planning examples
|
|
|
|
**Target Methods:**
|
|
- `api.motion.generate_velocity_profile(trajectory, profile='trapezoidal')`
|
|
- `api.motion.generate_arc(center, radius, start_angle, end_angle)`
|
|
- `api.motion.generate_circle(center, radius)`
|
|
- `api.motion.generate_spiral(center, radius, pitch)`
|
|
- `api.motion.blend_trajectories(traj1, traj2, blend_radius)`
|
|
- `api.motion.transform_coordinates(pose, frame='BASE')`
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## ✅ Phase 5: API Restructuring (COMPLETE)
|
|
|
|
**Objective:** Clean, namespaced API architecture
|
|
|
|
**Completed Tasks:**
|
|
- ✅ Create SafetyAPI namespace class
|
|
- ✅ Create IOAPI namespace class
|
|
- ✅ Create MonitoringAPI namespace class
|
|
- ✅ Create LoggingAPI namespace class
|
|
- ✅ Create KRLAPI namespace class
|
|
- ✅ Create ToolsAPI namespace class
|
|
- ✅ Create VizAPI namespace class
|
|
- ✅ Create MotionAPI namespace class
|
|
- ✅ Create DiagnosticsAPI placeholder class
|
|
- ✅ Restructure RSIAPI as orchestrator with namespace properties
|
|
|
|
**New Namespace Structure:**
|
|
```python
|
|
api = RSIAPI('RSI_EthernetConfig.xml')
|
|
api.motion # Motion control
|
|
api.io # Digital I/O
|
|
api.krl # KRL manipulation
|
|
api.safety # Safety management
|
|
api.monitoring # Live data access
|
|
api.logging # CSV logging
|
|
api.diagnostics # Network diagnostics
|
|
api.viz # Visualization
|
|
api.tools # Utilities
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Breaking Changes:**
|
|
- No backward compatibility (clean slate)
|
|
- Old API completely replaced with namespaced structure
|
|
|
|
**Files Created:**
|
|
- `motion_api.py`, `io_api.py`, `krl_api.py`, `safety_api.py`
|
|
- `monitoring_api.py`, `logging_api.py`, `diagnostics_api.py`
|
|
- `viz_api.py`, `tools_api.py`
|
|
|
|
**Commit:** `50e6df9` (January 16, 2026)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 📋 Phase 6: Validation & Benchmarking (PLANNED)
|
|
|
|
**Objective:** Prove production-readiness and publish results
|
|
|
|
**Planned Tasks:**
|
|
1. Create performance benchmark suite (vs ROS, vs KUKA SDK)
|
|
2. Run long-duration stability tests with real robot
|
|
3. Document example applications and use cases
|
|
|
|
**Expected Deliverables:**
|
|
- Benchmark comparison report (RSIPI vs ROS vs KUKA SDK)
|
|
- 24-hour+ stability test results
|
|
- Latency/jitter performance analysis
|
|
- Example applications repository
|
|
- Use case documentation
|
|
- Publication-ready performance data
|
|
|
|
**Benchmark Metrics:**
|
|
- Communication latency (round-trip time)
|
|
- Jitter and timing variance
|
|
- Maximum sustainable update rate
|
|
- CPU/memory overhead comparison
|
|
- Reliability (packet loss, connection uptime)
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Project Structure After All Phases
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
rsi-pi/
|
|
├── src/RSIPI/
|
|
│ ├── rsi_api.py # Main orchestrator
|
|
│ ├── rsi_client.py # Core RSI client
|
|
│ ├── motion_api.py # Motion control namespace
|
|
│ ├── io_api.py # Digital I/O namespace
|
|
│ ├── krl_api.py # KRL manipulation namespace
|
|
│ ├── safety_api.py # Safety management namespace
|
|
│ ├── monitoring_api.py # Monitoring namespace
|
|
│ ├── logging_api.py # CSV logging namespace
|
|
│ ├── diagnostics_api.py # Network diagnostics namespace
|
|
│ ├── viz_api.py # Visualization namespace
|
|
│ ├── tools_api.py # Utilities namespace
|
|
│ ├── network_handler.py # UDP communication
|
|
│ ├── config_parser.py # XML config parsing
|
|
│ ├── safety_manager.py # Safety validation
|
|
│ ├── exceptions.py # Exception hierarchy
|
|
│ ├── xml_handler.py # XML generation
|
|
│ ├── trajectory_planner.py # Trajectory generation
|
|
│ ├── static_plotter.py # Static plots
|
|
│ ├── live_plotter.py # Live plots
|
|
│ ├── krl_to_csv_parser.py # KRL parsing
|
|
│ ├── inject_rsi_to_krl.py # KRL injection
|
|
│ └── kuka_visualiser.py # Visualization
|
|
├── tests/ # Test suite
|
|
├── examples/ # Example applications
|
|
├── benchmarks/ # Performance benchmarks
|
|
├── docs/ # Documentation
|
|
├── README.md
|
|
└── RSIPI_ROADMAP.md # This file
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Success Criteria
|
|
|
|
**Phase 1 & 5 (Complete):**
|
|
- ✅ 500+ type annotations across codebase
|
|
- ✅ 20+ custom exceptions with proper hierarchy
|
|
- ✅ Zero print() statements (all logging)
|
|
- ✅ Comprehensive docstrings on all public methods
|
|
- ✅ 9 namespaced API classes with clean separation
|
|
- ✅ Professional API design pattern
|
|
|
|
**Phase 2 (Planned):**
|
|
- Real-time network quality monitoring
|
|
- Automatic recovery from network failures
|
|
- <5ms average latency, <2ms jitter
|
|
- 24-hour stability test passes
|
|
- Comprehensive diagnostics dashboard
|
|
|
|
**Phase 3 (Planned):**
|
|
- High-level I/O API with pulse generation
|
|
- Python-KRL coordination patterns documented
|
|
- Tech variable parameter passing working
|
|
- KRL template library created
|
|
- Example coordination workflows
|
|
|
|
**Phase 4 (Planned):**
|
|
- Trapezoidal and S-curve velocity profiles
|
|
- Arc, circle, spiral motion primitives
|
|
- Path blending with configurable blend radius
|
|
- Coordinate frame transformations
|
|
- Smooth continuous motion demonstrated
|
|
|
|
**Phase 6 (Planned):**
|
|
- Performance benchmarks vs ROS/KUKA SDK
|
|
- Publication-ready data and graphs
|
|
- Long-duration stability proven
|
|
- Multiple example applications
|
|
- Use cases documented
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Timeline
|
|
|
|
- **Phase 1:** ✅ Complete (January 16, 2026)
|
|
- **Phase 5:** ✅ Complete (January 16, 2026)
|
|
- **Phase 2:** 📋 Next priority
|
|
- **Phase 3:** 📋 After Phase 2
|
|
- **Phase 4:** 📋 After Phase 3
|
|
- **Phase 6:** 📋 Final validation
|
|
|
|
**Approach:** "Get it right the first time" - complete each phase fully before moving to the next.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Research Publication Goal
|
|
|
|
**Target:** High-quality research paper demonstrating RSIPI as lightweight, high-performance alternative to ROS for KUKA robot control in drilling/manufacturing applications.
|
|
|
|
**Key Points:**
|
|
- Python-based, easy to integrate
|
|
- ~250Hz update rate, <5ms latency
|
|
- Industrial-grade reliability
|
|
- Comprehensive safety features
|
|
- Minimal dependencies
|
|
- Professional API design
|
|
- Proven stability (24-hour tests)
|
|
- Benchmarked against ROS
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Notes
|
|
|
|
- No backward compatibility - clean slate design
|
|
- Focus on quality over speed
|
|
- All features properly documented
|
|
- Type-safe with comprehensive testing
|
|
- Suitable for industrial research applications
|
|
- Designed for drilling PhD research (but general-purpose)
|
|
|
|
**Last Updated:** January 16, 2026
|